9/2/2023 0 Comments Diablo 3 bot mac![]() ![]() ![]() "Original research" is material for which no reliable source can be found. From WP:NOR: "Wikipedia does not publish original research or original thought. Gh5046 ( talk) 23:39, 23 July 2008 (UTC) The information is notable, and neutral. The game hasn't been released, it doesn't even have a release date. Dorvaq ( talk) 15:23, 22 July 2008 (UTC) No, what would be notable is if the design choices negatively affected the sales of the game, if the publisher didn't sell as many as they projected. Any thoughts? 87.102.86.73 ( talk) 02:15, 20 July 2008 (UTC) Well, given that articles are being written on fan reaction regarding the color choice and online petitions have been created to pressure Blizzard into reverting back to the original color scheme, I think the issue is pretty notable. ![]() I suggest wait and see to prevent any edit-wars etc. What I do question is its relevence - ie is it notable enough for inclusion, or does it just represent a blip in the overall scheme of things? "" is actually not neutral in the context of the article. something else.Īlso I note that I call into question any suggestion that the labelled section " Although reception of the initial announcement and gameplay. remove the tag and leave the fan response section in place (I have no objection) 5. ![]() remove the fan response section and the tag (I have no objection) 4. just leave the neutrality tag there and wait for the problem to sort itself out (I favour this) 2. Has the neutrality issue been sorted out yet? The 'fan response' section looks a little less relevent now than it did a few weeks ago, maybe in a few more it will be totally forgotten.ġ. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |